Hammett

Hammett v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20203:19-cv-00605California603 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAURA LYNN HAMMETT, Case No.: 19-CV-605 JLS (LL)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. SECOND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

RETAIN REPRESENTATION ON

MARY E. SHERMAN, et al.,

LIMITED SCOPE

Defendants. (ECF No. 146)

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Laura Lynn Hammett’s Motion for Leave to Retain Representation for Special Appearance for the Purpose of Collection of Fees and Costs for Process of Services and Attorney Fees and Costs for the Collection of Said Fees and Costs Pursuant to L.R. 83.3(f)(4) (“Mot.,” ECF No. 146). Although the Court set this matter for a hearing on September 10, 2020, the Court concludes that this matter is suitable for resolution on the papers pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). Plaintiff explains that she “is a pro se litigant who must spend days of her time learning each specific procedure and substantive law for each subject that is involved in the present…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.