Vashisht-Rota

Vashisht-Rota v. Harrisburg University

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20203:20-cv-00967California1,134 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA, an Case No.: 20-CV-967 JLS (KSC) individual,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

Plaintiff, PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION v. TO FILE COMPLAINT, AMENDED

COMPLAINT, AND EXHIBITS A–E

HARRISBURG UNIVERSITY,

UNDER SEAL Defendant. 16 (ECF No. 39)

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Dr. Aparna Vashisht-Rota’s Motion to File Complaint, Amended Complaint, and Exhibit[s] A–E Under Seal (“Mot.,” ECF No. 39). The Motion is unopposed. Having carefully reviewed Plaintiff’s arguments, the documents in question (ECF Nos. 1, 7), and the relevant law, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s Motion. LEGAL STANDARD “[T]he courts of this country recognize a general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.” Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). “Unless a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.