Jae Properties, Inc. v. Amtax Holdings 2001-XX, LLC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 12, 20203:19-cv-02075California3,235 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12 13 JAE PROPERTIES, INC., Case No.: 19cv2075-JAH-LL 14 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT AND

15 v. COUNTER-PLAINTIFF AMTAX HOLDINGS 2001-XX, LLC’S

AMTAX HOLDINGS 2001-XX, LLC,

MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER

17 Defendant. DEPOSITION TESTIMONY OF ROGER HARTMAN __________________________________ 19 AMTAX HOLDINGS 2001-XX, LLC and REDACTED

VICTORIA HEIGHTS LTD.,

Counter-Plaintiffs, [ECF No. 65] v.

JAE PROPERTIES, INC.,

Counter-Claim Defendant. 25 26 27 / / / 28 On July 14, 2020, counsel for the parties called the Court to discuss a discovery dispute regarding an issue raised by Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff AMTAX Holdings 2001-XX, LLC (hereinafter “Amtax”) for the Court’s intervention. The Court issued a briefing schedule. ECF No. 62. Amtax timely filed the Motion to Compel (hereinafter “Motion”), seeking further deposition testimony from Roger C. Hartman. See ECF Nos. 65, 73. Amtax…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.