Rodriguez

Rodriguez v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20203:19-cv-00424California3,210 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIE RODRIGUEZ, Case No.: 19-cv-0424-L-MDD

Plaintiff,

REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; ADAM

RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

RATCLIFFE; TIMOTHY DENNY;

TERMINATING SANCTIONS Defendants. 16 [ECF No. 24] 17 Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Terminating Sanctions; or in 18 the Alternative, Evidentiary Sanctions. (ECF No. 24). The Motion requests 19 the Court terminate this case due to Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute her claims 20 and follow the Court’s Order. This Report and Recommendation is submitted 21 to United States District Judge M. James Lorenz pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 22 636(b)(1) and Local Civil Rule 72.1(c)(1) of the United States District Court 23 for the Southern District of California. For the reasons set forth herein, the 24 25 26 1 All pincite page references refer to the automatically generated ECF page Court RECOMMENDS that Defendants’ Motion be GRANTED…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.