Sebastian

Sebastian v. One Brands, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20203:20-cv-00009California156 words

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 |} BRITTANY SEBASTIAN, individually Case No.: 20cv0009-L-MDD ll and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, CLASS ACTION

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ONE BRANDS LLC et al., Toots. S MOTION

Defendant. 16 Pending before the Court is Defendant Hershey Company’s (“Hershey”) motion to 18 || dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) for lack of personal ||jurisdiction. (Doc. no. 10). Plaintiff filed a notice of non-opposition. (Doc. no. 17.) 20 || Hershey's motion is therefore granted as unopposed. See Civ. Loc. Rule 7.1.f.3.c; 21 || Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53-54 (9th Cir. 1995). All claims asserted against 22 || Defendant Hershey Company are dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 10, 2020 wu oer ftp H . James Lorenz, United States District Judge 27 28