Hammett
Hammett v. Sherman
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20203:19-cv-00605California688 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAURA LYNN HAMMETT, Case No.: 19-CV-605 JLS (LL)
Plaintiff,
ORDER (1) GRANTING THE
v. SHERMAN DEFENDANTS’ EX
PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN
MARY E. SHERMAN, et al.,
EXTENSION OF TIME TO
Defendants. RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT, AND (2) EXTENDING
DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
(ECF No. 147)
20 Presently before the Court is the Ex Parte Application for an Extension of Time to Respond to Second Amended Complaint (“Ex Parte App.,” ECF No. 147) filed by Defendants Mary Sherman and Jeffrey Sherman in all their named capacities (the “Sherman Defendants”), as well as Plaintiff Laura Lynn Hammett’s Opposition (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 149). The Sherman Defendants seek a three-week extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, see Ex Parte App. at 1,…