Hammett

Hammett v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20203:19-cv-00605California688 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAURA LYNN HAMMETT, Case No.: 19-CV-605 JLS (LL)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING THE

v. SHERMAN DEFENDANTS’ EX

PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN

MARY E. SHERMAN, et al.,

EXTENSION OF TIME TO

Defendants. RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT, AND (2) EXTENDING

DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO

PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

(ECF No. 147)

20 Presently before the Court is the Ex Parte Application for an Extension of Time to Respond to Second Amended Complaint (“Ex Parte App.,” ECF No. 147) filed by Defendants Mary Sherman and Jeffrey Sherman in all their named capacities (the “Sherman Defendants”), as well as Plaintiff Laura Lynn Hammett’s Opposition (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 149). The Sherman Defendants seek a three-week extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, see Ex Parte App. at 1,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.