Patton

Patton v. Flores

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20203:19-cv-00659California4,164 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL PATTON, Case No.: 3:19-cv-00659-WQH-LL

CDCR #AV-5870,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) DENYING MOTION FOR

RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT

OFFICER FLORES, et al., PURSUANT TO Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) Defendants. [ECF No. 21]

(2) DISMISSING SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT

PURSUANT TO

28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) AND 1915A(b)

AND

22 (3) DENYING MOTION FOR OSC/TRO [ECF No. 19]

24 More than a year ago, Plaintiff Michael Patton, a prisoner at California Medical 25 Facility (“CMF”), and proceeding pro se, filed this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 26 § 1983. See Compl., ECF No. 1. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma 27 pauperis (“IFP”), but both his original and amended complaints have been dismissed sua 28 sponte pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A(b), despite his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.