Veasy
Veasy v. Tricopian, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TYLER VEASY, Case No. 19-cv-2060-MMA (JLB)
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: DISMISSAL
v.
TRICOPIAN, INC., and TRICOPIAN (SWITZERLAND) SARL, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 On July 24, 2020, the parties filed a “Joint Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice” pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A). See Doc. No. 21. Given the joint stipulation and its basis under Rule 41(a)(1)(A), this case has been dismissed and the action has been terminated. See Commercial Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[O]nce a notice of voluntary dismissal is filed, the district court in which the action is pending loses jurisdiction and cannot exercise discretion with respect to the terms and conditions of the dismissal.”); see also Duke Energy Trading & Mktg., L.L.C. v. Davis, 267 F.3d 1042, 1049 (9th Cir. 2001) (“The [filing of a Rule 41(a)(1)(i) notice] itself closes the file.”); Acosta v. Lopez, No. 1:18-cv-00625-AWI-SKO, 2019 WL 5536321,…