Yablonsky

Yablonsky v. California Department of Correction & Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20203:18-cv-01122California562 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 John Henry YABLONSKY Case No.: 18cv1122-CAB-AGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING NOTICE OF

v. OBJECTION [Doc. No. 51] CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTION AND

REHABILITATION,

16 Defendants.

18 On October 7, 2019, Defendants D. Powell, G. Martinez, J. Robles, D. McGuire, 19 R. Blahnik, and C. Tiscarnia (“Defendants”) filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s First 20 Amended Complaint (“FAC”). [Doc. No. 39.] On June 2, 2020, Magistrate Judge 21 Andrew G. Schopler prepared a Report and Recommendation (“Report”) recommending 22 that the motion to dismiss be granted in part and denied in part. [Doc. No. 39.] On July 23 14, 2020, this Court issued an order adopting the Report, granting in part and denying in 24 part the motion to dismiss the FAC, and giving Plaintiff until August 7, 2020, to file a 25 Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). [Doc. No. 43.] The order also stated that if 26 Plaintiff did not file an SAC, then Defendants were to answer the FAC (as amended by 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.