Huerta

Huerta v. Nielsen

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20203:18-cv-01640California4,928 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID HUERTA, Case No. 18cv1640-MMA (LL)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary of

Homeland Security,1 et al., [Doc. No. 33] Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff David Huerta is a Seized Property Specialist with United States Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”), Department of Homeland Security. He brings this action pro se pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16, which protects federal employees from discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Plaintiff has filed a First Amended Complaint in which he alleges that his supervisor racially discriminated and retaliated against him. See Doc. No. 20. The government moves for summary judgment as to all claims. See Doc. No. 33. Plaintiff 25 26 1 Chad F. Wolf is now the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security. Pursuant to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.