Huerta
Huerta v. Nielsen
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID HUERTA, Case No. 18cv1640-MMA (LL)
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary of
Homeland Security,1 et al., [Doc. No. 33] Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff David Huerta is a Seized Property Specialist with United States Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”), Department of Homeland Security. He brings this action pro se pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16, which protects federal employees from discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Plaintiff has filed a First Amended Complaint in which he alleges that his supervisor racially discriminated and retaliated against him. See Doc. No. 20. The government moves for summary judgment as to all claims. See Doc. No. 33. Plaintiff 25 26 1 Chad F. Wolf is now the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security. Pursuant to…