Lee v. Verimatrix Inc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JAMES PYUNG LEE and HEE SOOK Case No.: 19-cv-2054-W (BLM)

NAM,

ORDER:

Plaintiffs, 14 v. (1) DENYING VERIMATRIX, INC.’S

MOTION TO DISMISS [DOC. 59]

VERIMATRIX, INC., ROBIN “ROSS”

AND COOPER, and INSIDE SECURE,

17 Defendants. (2) DENYING ROBIN “ROSS” COOPER’S MOTION TO DISMISS [DOC. 63] 19 Pending before the Court are Defendant Verimatrix, Inc.’s (“Verimatrix”) and Robin “Ross” Cooper’s (“Cooper”) motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and lack of subject-matter jurisdiction under 12(b)(1). (Verimatrix MTD [Doc. 59]; Cooper MTD [Doc. 63].) The Court decides the matters on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES Verimatrix’s motion [Doc. 59], and DENIES Cooper’s motion [Doc. 63]. 27 28 I. BACKGROUND …