United States v. K.O.O. Construction

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 18, 20203:19-cv-01535California684 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for Case No.: 19cv1535-JAH-LL the use and benefit of ANDREW C. 12 CHEN, an individual, doing business as ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND TECTONICS, DENYING IN PART JOINT

MOTION TO REQUEST

Plaintiff,

CONTINUANCE OF EXPERT

v. DISCOVERY AND OTHER DATES

AND DEADLINES

K.O.O. CONSTRUCTION, INC., a

California corporation, 17 Defendant. [ECF No. 33]

19 K.O.O. CONSTRUCTION, INC., a 20 California corporation, 21 Counter Claimant, 22 v. 23 ANDREW C. CHEN, an individual, doing business as TECTONICS, Counter Defendant. / / / / / / / / / Currently before the Court is the parties’ joint motion requesting that the Court continue the deadline for expert discovery and subsequent deadlines including and up to the deadline for filing pretrial motions. ECF No. 33. The parties request an approximate 30-day continuance of these deadlines on the basis that “the parties still await…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.