United States v. K.O.O. Construction
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for Case No.: 19cv1535-JAH-LL the use and benefit of ANDREW C. 12 CHEN, an individual, doing business as ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND TECTONICS, DENYING IN PART JOINT
MOTION TO REQUEST
Plaintiff,
CONTINUANCE OF EXPERT
v. DISCOVERY AND OTHER DATES
AND DEADLINES
K.O.O. CONSTRUCTION, INC., a
California corporation, 17 Defendant. [ECF No. 33]
19 K.O.O. CONSTRUCTION, INC., a 20 California corporation, 21 Counter Claimant, 22 v. 23 ANDREW C. CHEN, an individual, doing business as TECTONICS, Counter Defendant. / / / / / / / / / Currently before the Court is the parties’ joint motion requesting that the Court continue the deadline for expert discovery and subsequent deadlines including and up to the deadline for filing pretrial motions. ECF No. 33. The parties request an approximate 30-day continuance of these deadlines on the basis that “the parties still await…