Sentynl Therapeutics, Inc. v. U.S. Specialty Insurance Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SENTYNL THERAPEUTICS, INC., Case No.: 3:19-cv-1667-LAB-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING JOINT
MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE
v.
FOR COMPLETION OF EXPERT
U.S. SPECIALTY INSURANCE WITNESS DISCOVERY
COMPANY,
16 [ECF No. 67] Defendant.
19 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Extend Deadline for Completion of Expert Witness Discovery. ECF No. 67. The parties seek an order from the Court extending the deadline to complete expert discovery by approximately two weeks. Id. at 2. Parties seeking to continue deadlines must demonstrate good cause. Chmb.R. at 2 (stating that any request for continuance requires “[a] showing of good cause for the request”); see also FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent”); FED. R. CIV. P. 6(b) (“When an act may or must be done within a specified time, the court may, for good cause, extend the time”). “Good cause” is a non-rigorous standard that…