Spatcher

Spatcher v. San Diego Sheriff Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20203:19-cv-01919California508 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 GREGORY LEON SPATCHER, Case No. 19-cv-1919-BAS-BLM CDCR #BJ-9222,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

Plaintiff,

v.

SAN DIEGO SHERIFF DEP’T, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Gregory Leon Spatcher filed a first amended complaint on January 9, 2020. On January 27, 2020, the Court dismissed certain Defendants but permitted the case to go forward against Defendants Lake and Escobar. (ECF No. 5.) The Court ordered the Clerk to forward to Plaintiff blank U.S. Marshal Form 285s for these two Defendants and ordered Plaintiff to fill out the forms and return them to the United States Marshal for service. No proof of service was filed. On July 14, 2020, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why Defendants have not been served. The Court ordered Plaintiff to file a response to the order informing the Court whether and when he filled out and returned the U.S. Marshal Form 285s. His response was due by August 7, 2020, and the Court noted: “Failure to timely respond 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.