Quidel Corporation v. Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20203:16-cv-03059California8,336 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 QUIDEL CORPORATION, Case No. 16-cv-3059-BAS-AGS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER: (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS MOTION FOR SUMMARY USA, INC., et al., JUDGMENT 16 Defendants. [ECF Nos. 301, 306]

17 18 Presently before the Court are the fourth and fifth summary judgment motions in this case. In May 2020, Defendants Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc. and Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. (collectively “Siemens”) moved to amend the scheduling order in this case so that they could file a successive motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 288.) The Court held oral argument on Siemens’ motion, and Plaintiff Quidel Corporation stated if the Court was inclined to grant the motion, it also would like to file a motion for summary judgment. The Court ordered any successive summary judgment motions to be filed by June 9, 2020. Both parties filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.