Hopper

Mitchell v. Hopper

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20203:19-cv-00006California1,131 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CORREY MITCHELL, Case No.: 19-CV-006 JLS (LL)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) OVERRULING

v. PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS, (2) ADOPTING REPORT AND LT. G. HOPPER, et al.,

RECOMMENDATION, AND

Defendants. (3) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

17 (ECF Nos. 13, 27) 18 19 Presently before the Court is Defendants G. Hopper, R. Luna, and A. Daniel’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 13). Also before the Court is Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez’s Report and Recommendation, which recommends that the Court grant Defendant’s Motion (“R&R,” ECF No. 27). Plaintiff filed Objections to the R&R (“Objs.,” ECF No. 28), to which Defendants filed a Reply (“Reply,” ECF No. 29). After considering the Parties’ arguments and the law, the Court (1) OVERRULES Plaintiff’s Objections, (2) ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety, and (3) GRANTS Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgement. /// …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.