Andrews

Andrews v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20203:19-cv-01873California6,679 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANDREA A., Case No.: 19cv1873-BEN-MDD

Plaintiff,

REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION ON CROSS

MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of

JUDGMENT

Social Security, 14 Defendant. [ECF Nos. 14, 15] 16 This Report and Recommendation is submitted to United States District Judge Roger T. Benitez pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Civil Rule 72.1(c) of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Plaintiff Andrea A. (“Plaintiff”) filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final administrative decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) denying Plaintiff’s application for Supplemental Security Income benefits 25 26 under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (“Act”). (AR at 11, 14)1. For the reasons expressed herein, the Court RECOMMENDS Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.