Spatcher

Spatcher v. City of Oceanside

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20203:20-cv-01554California788 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY LEON SPATCHER, Case No.: 3:20-CV-1554 JLS (WVG)

CDCR #BJ-9222,

ORDER: (1) DISMISSING CIVIL

Plaintiff, ACTION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. vs. § 1915A(b)(1); AND (2) DENYING

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS AS MOOT

CITY OF OCEANSIDE; OFFICER

BEATRIZ GONZALES; OFFICER

JEFFREY BRANDT, Defendants. 19 20 21 Plaintiff Gregory Leon Spatcher, currently incarcerated at the California Institution for Men (“CIM”) in Chino, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Compl., ECF No. 1. Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) when he filed his Complaint; instead, he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (ECF No. 2). / / / I. Sua Sponte Screening Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) The Prison Litigation Reform Act…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.