Diaz

Cummings v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20203:20-cv-01020California4,591 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD MAURICE CUMMINGS, Case No.: 3:20-cv-01020 CAB-WVG

CDCR #AF-0209,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

RALPH DIAZ, Sec. of the CDCR; [ECF No. 3]; DANIEL PARAMO, Warden; C.

COVEL, Assoc. Warden; M. KEENER,

AND

Sergeant; BONAFICIO, Corrections 17 Officer, DOES 1-100, 2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR Defendants. FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) & 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) 20 21 Edward Cummings (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at Mule Creek State Prison (“MCSP”) located in Ione, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Compl., ECF No. 1. Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), nor did he file a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) when he filed his Complaint, and the Court dismissed the action on June…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.