Kula

Williams v. Kula

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20203:20-cv-01120California6,327 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS and Case No.: 3:20-cv-1120-GPC-AHG

LEGACY GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT

ORDER:

LLC,

13 Plaintiffs, (1) GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR v. DISCOVERY; and

THOMAS KULA; JOANNE KULA;

ELIZABETH DIAZ; KATHI OSTEEN; (2) DEFERRING OTHER MOTIONS

STEPHEN HONEYBILL; LINDSEY FOR RULING BY DISTRICT JUDGE

STEWART; THERESA RAGLEN;

ROGER “ARI” KAHN; and DOES 1-20, [ECF No. 33] Defendants. 20 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ consolidated Ex Parte Motion to (1) Bifurcate Defendants’ Special Motions to Strike and Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction; (2) Continue the Hearing Date for the Special Motions to Strike; and (3) Grant Plaintiffs Discovery During the Continuance of Defendants’ Special Motions to Strike. ECF No. 33. This Order concerns solely the third of these motions, which seeks discovery. All other requests in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.