Vashisht-Rota

Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 28, 20203:20-cv-00321California530 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA, an Case No.: 20-CV-321 JLS (KSC) individual,

ORDER (1) GRANTING

Plaintiff, EXTENSION OF TIME, AND v. (2) CLARIFYING AUGUST 14, 2020

ORDER [ECF NO. 55]

HOWELL MANAGEMENT SERVICES,

16 a Utah limited liability company; CHRIS (ECF No. 60) HOWELL, an individual; and JUSTIN SPENCER, an individual, 18 Defendants.

20 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Aparna Vashisht-Rota’s Ex-Parte Motion for Clarification of Order at Docket Entry 55 (“Ex Parte Mot.,” ECF No. 60). In its August 14, 2020 Order (ECF No. 55), the Court ordered the Parties to meet and confer “regarding any narrowly tailored redactions necessary to protect Defendants’ confidential business information.” Id. at 5. Plaintiff reports that the Parties have met and conferred, Ex Parte Mot. at 1, “but Defendants have redacted all of the[ paragraphs and exhibits referenced in the Court’s August 14, 2020 Order] fully,” meaning “the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.