Mitchell v. Chula Vista Parole

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20203:20-cv-00919California5,275 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENYATTA QUINN MITCHELL, Case No. 20cv919-MMA-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;

v. [Doc. No. 7]

DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR

CHULA VISTA PAROLE, FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) Defendant. AND 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) 18 19 20 On May 15, 2020, Plaintiff Kenyatta Quinn Mitchell, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging Defendant “Chula Vista Parole” failed to protect him from an individual who was on parole in Chula Vista, California. See Doc. No. 1. Plaintiff filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Doc. No. 2. On July 31, 2019, the Court denied his IFP motion as insufficiently supported. See Doc. No. 3. Plaintiff has now filed a renewed IFP motion. See Doc. No. 7. 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.