Whittle
Whittle v. Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAWN WHITTLE, Case No.: 20cv1452-NLS
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. (1) DISMISSING COMPLAINT ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of the WITH LEAVE TO AMEND; and Social Security Administration, 15 Defendant. (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
18 [ECF No. 3]
21 Before the Court is Plaintiff Dawn Whittle’s complaint seeking judicial review of 22 the Social Security Administration’s decision and motion for leave to proceed in forma 23 pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. 1, 2. After due consideration and for the reasons set forth 24 below, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend, if amended 25 within 60 days of the date of this order, and DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the 26 motion to process IFP. 27 // 28 I. Screening Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) A complaint filed pursuant to the IFP provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), is subject to a mandatory and sua sponte review by the Court. Lopez v. Smith, 203…