Stroud
Stroud v. Neuschmid
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLERIDGE B. STROUD, Case No.: 19-CV-924 JLS (WVG)
Petitioner,
ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT
v. AND RECOMMENDATION, (2) DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT ROBERT NEUSCHMID, Warden,
OF HABEAS CORPUS, AND
Respondent. (3) DENYING CERTIFICATE OF
APPEALABILITY
(ECF Nos. 1, 13) 18 Presently before the Court is Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R,” ECF No. 13). Magistrate Judge Gallo recommends that the Court deny Petitioner Coleridge Stroud’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1). Petitioner did not object to the R&R. Having considered Magistrate Judge Gallo’s R&R, the Parties’ arguments, and the law, the Court rules as follows. BACKGROUND Magistrate Judge Gallo’s R&R contains a complete and accurate recitation of the relevant factual and procedural histories underlying the Petition. See R&R at 1–4. …