Stroud

Stroud v. Neuschmid

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 18, 20203:19-cv-00924California976 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLERIDGE B. STROUD, Case No.: 19-CV-924 JLS (WVG)

Petitioner,

ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT

v. AND RECOMMENDATION, (2) DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT ROBERT NEUSCHMID, Warden,

OF HABEAS CORPUS, AND

Respondent. (3) DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

(ECF Nos. 1, 13) 18 Presently before the Court is Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R,” ECF No. 13). Magistrate Judge Gallo recommends that the Court deny Petitioner Coleridge Stroud’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1). Petitioner did not object to the R&R. Having considered Magistrate Judge Gallo’s R&R, the Parties’ arguments, and the law, the Court rules as follows. BACKGROUND Magistrate Judge Gallo’s R&R contains a complete and accurate recitation of the relevant factual and procedural histories underlying the Petition. See R&R at 1–4. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.