Ewing

Ewing v. Agam

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20203:19-cv-02291California1,133 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTON EWING Case No.: 19cv2291-LAB (MSB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. AND DENYING IN PART

MOTION TO DISMISS

CANOPY ENERGY CALIFORNIA,

et al. 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Anton Ewing, a repeat filer of Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) claims, filed his complaint, bringing claim sunder the TCPA and California’s Invasion of Privacy Act. Defendant Canopy Energy California then moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim (Docket no. 4). Ewing then filed an amended complaint (the “FAC”), as permitted under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15, without having opposed the motion. Even though he had amended, the court noted that the amended complaint appeared to be similar, and ordered Plaintiff to file a response. (Docket no. 10.) The Court also ordered Ewing to file a redlined copy of his complaint to show what changes he made, and he has now done this. / / / Ewing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.