Becerra
(HC) Covarrubias v. Becerra
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SANTIAGO COVARRUBIAS, Case No.: 19-cv-00546-BAS-WVG
Petitioner, ORDER: 12 v. (1) DENYING MOTION FOR STAY
AND ABEYANCE WITHOUT
NEIL McDOWELL, Warden, et al., PREJUDICE AND WITH
LEAVE TO RESUBMIT
Respondents. [ECF No. 24];
AND
(2) REMANDING TO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
[ECF No. 17] 18 Santiago Covarrubias is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a First Amended Petition (“FAP) for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, claiming his Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated because no evidence corroborated his accomplice’s testimony (claim one) and because the court admitted overly prejudicial evidence (claims two and three). (ECF No. 8.) His FAP also presents a state law sentencing claim (claim four). (Id.) Respondent Neil McDowell has filed an Answer contending it “appears” Petitioner has exhausted state court remedies as to all claims in the FAP, and arguing habeas relief is unavailable…