Sandoval

Sandoval v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20203:19-cv-01477California453 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOLORES SANDOVAL, Case No.: 19-CV-1477-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT

v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of [Doc. No. 21.] Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 The parties have stipulated that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees in the amount of $6,500 under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and no costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d). Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After this Order is entered, the government shall determine whether they are subject to any offset. Fees shall be made payable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.