Standifird

Standifird v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 20203:20-cv-01630California1,719 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 20CV1630-BLM VICTORIA ELIZABETH STANDIFIRD,

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S

v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT

ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

PREPAYING OF FEES OR COSTS AND

SECURITY,

DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE Defendant. TO AMEND 16 [ECF NOs. 3 & 4]

18 The instant matter was initiated on August 21, 2020 when Plaintiff filed a complaint “to seek judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision and [to] request[] that this court reverse that decision, or in the alternative, to remand this matter for a new hearing.” ECF No. 1 at 2. That same day, Plaintiff filed an Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs. ECF No. at 3. Having reviewed the complaint and motion, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s complaint does not sufficiently state a claim for relief. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Application to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.