James
James v. Lee
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KYLE ROBERT JAMES, Case No.: 16-cv-01592-AJB (JLB), consolidated with 17-cv-00859-AJB Plaintiff, (MDD) v.
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S
BARBARA LEE, et al.,
MISCELLANEOUS MOTIONS
Defendants.1 [ECF Nos. 140; 142; 155] 16 Before the Court are several miscellaneous motions filed by Plaintiff Kyle Robert James. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion for copies (ECF No. 140 at 1– 2), motion for additional interrogatories (ECF No. 142), and motion to exclude evidence (ECF No. 155) are DENIED, and Plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF No. 140 at 3–8) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. MOTION FOR COPY OF INTERROGATORIES Plaintiff requests that the Court direct the Clerk of Court to send him a free copy of the exhibits he attached to his motion to compel (ECF No. 140 at 10–16), which are 25 26 27 Defendant Mark Kania is the only remaining defendant in this case. Therefore, all references to “Defendant” in…