Reynoso
Reynoso v. Pascasio
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 |) JUAN REYNOSO, Case No.: 20CV1425-GPC(LL) Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING THIRD PARTY
13 || Vv. UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO ae SUBSTITUTE IN PLACE OF □□□ ae nae naieals INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS AND ° ; GRANTING UNITED STATES’ Defendants.! MOTION TO DISMISS FOR
FAILURE TO EXHAUST
ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES [Dkt. No. 2.] 19 Before the Court is Third Party United States’ motion to substitute the United 21 || States as a defendant in place of the individual defendants Samuel Pascasio and Fely 22 || Cruz (erroneously sued as Faley Doe), and once substituted, the United States moves to 23 || dismiss the complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (Dkt. No. 2.) 24 || Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, did not file an opposition. Based on the reasoning below, the ||Court GRANTS…