Rivers

Rivers v. San Diego County

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20203:20-cv-00792California2,023 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELVIN WARREN RIVERS, Case No.: 3:20-cv-0792-GPC-AGS aka Juice Lee 12 Booking No. 45526-298, ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR Plaintiff,

FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

14 vs. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) AND 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b)

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO;

ALESSANDRA SERANO

VINCENT BALES; WILLIAM

LANSDOWNE,

Defendants. 20 21 22 I. Procedural History On April 27, 2020, Melvin Warren Rivers, aka “Juice Lee,” (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, currently incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution (“FCI”) located in Mendota, California, filed this civil action. See Compl., ECF No. 1. Plaintiff purported to bring this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Id.) Because Plaintiff also sought relief against federal actors, the Court liberally construed those claims as arising under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.