Rodriguez

Rodriguez v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20203:19-cv-00424California390 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIE RODRIGUEZ, Case No.: 3:19-cv-424-L-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT

v. AND RECOMMENDATION; (2)

DISMISSING ACTION WITH

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO et al.,

PREJUDICE; AND (3) AWARDING

Defendants. COSTS AND ATTORNEYS’ FEES 16 Pending before the Court in this action alleging excessive force by San Diego County Sheriff’s Deputies is a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) issued by Magistrate Mitchell D. Dembin (doc. no. 31), recommending to grant is Defendants' motion for terminating sanctions, or in the alternative, evidentiary sanctions (doc. no. 24). Defendants’ motion is based on Plaintiff’s repeated failure to appear for deposition over the course of six months, failure to respond to written discovery, and failure to pay monetary sanctions. No objections have been filed to the R&R. A district judge "may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition" on a dispositive…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.