Victorino

Victorino v. FCA US LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20203:16-cv-01617California3,969 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARLOS VICTORINO and ADAM Case No.: 16cv1617-GPC(JLB) TAVITIAN, individually, and on behalf of 12 other members of the general public ORDER GRANTING IN PART similarly situated, PLAINTIFF’S RENEWED MOTION

FOR ORDER FOR APPROVAL OF

Plaintiffs,

PROPOSED CLASS NOTICE AND

v. NOTICE PLAN

FCA US LLC, a Delaware limited liability [Dkt. No. 350.] company, , 17 Defendant.

19 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s renewed motion for order for approval of proposed 20 class notice and notice plan filed on May 29, 2020. (Dkt. No. 350.) Defendant filed an 21 opposition on June 5, 2020. (Dkt. No. 351.) Plaintiff filed a reply on June 12, 2020. 22 (Dkt. No. 352.) The Court finds that the matter is appropriate for decision without oral 23 argument pursuant to Local Civ. R. 7.1(d)(1). Based on the reasoning below, the Court 24 GRANTS in part Plaintiff’s renewed motion for approval of proposed class notice and 25 notice plan. 26 / / / 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.