Escamilla

Escamilla v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20203:17-cv-01621California2,326 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MANUEL P. ESCAMILLA, Case No. 17-cv-01621-BAS-JMA

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF v. ATTORNEY’S FEES (ECF No. 21)

ANDEW M. SAUL, Commissioner of 15 Social Security,

Defendant.

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Manuel Escamilla’s motion for approval of attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (ECF No. 21.) The Commissioner of Social Security responded to the motion. (ECF No. 23.) The Court finds Escamilla’s motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion for approval of attorney’s fees. I. BACKGROUND On August 24, 2012, Escamilla filed an application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits, alleging disability commencing on February 2, 2009. (Administrative Record (“AR”) 186–88,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.