Buckelew

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DION SCOTT BUCKELEW, Case No.: 3:20-cv-00158-WQH-JLB

ORDER

Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 WILLIAM D. GORE, et al.,

16 Defendants. 17 HAYES, Judge: 18 The matters before the Court are the Motion to Quash Service and Dismiss for Lack 19 of Personal Jurisdiction, or alternatively, Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by 20 Defendants (ECF No. 3) and the Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate 21 Judge (ECF No. 9). 22 The duties of the district court in connection with a report and recommendation of a 23 magistrate judge are set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 24 636(b). The district judge must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the 25 report . . . to which objection is made” and “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in 26 part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). 27 The district court need not review de novo those portions of a Report and Recommendation 28 which neither party objects. See Wang v. Masaitis, 416 F.3d 992, …