Sekerke

Sekerke v. Olsen

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20203:20-cv-01045California4,777 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEITH WAYNE SEKERKE, Case No.: 20cv1045-GPC (RBB) Booking No. 18165284,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

[ECF No. 2]; AND

SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF

DEPUTIES DANE OLSEN, ADAM 2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR

ARKWRIGHT and MIKE LAWSON, FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM Defendants. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) AND § 1915A(b) 19 Plaintiff Keith Wayne Sekerke has filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against San Diego County Sheriff Deputies Olsen, Arkwright and Lawson claiming he was subjected to cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment by the conditions of confinement in disciplinary segregation at the San Diego Central Jail. (ECF No. 1 at 3-10.) He alleges his placement there was based on false charges brought by Defendant Olsen, that Defendants Arkwright and Lawson retained him there without due process, and that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.