Lucore

Catamount Properties 2018, LLC v. Lucore

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20203:19-cv-02158California839 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CATAMOUNT PROPERTIES 2018, Case No.: 19cv2158-L-AHG

LLC,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, REMAND v.

PAUL M. LUCORE,

15 Defendant.

Pending before the Court in this unlawful detainer action is Plaintiff’s motion to remand. Defendant filed an opposition. Plaintiff has not filed a reply. The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L. R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff's motion is granted. Defendant removed this unlawful detainer action from State court under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1443(1) and 1441. "Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. They possess only that power authorized by Constitution or statute, which is not to be expanded by judicial decree. It is to be presumed that a cause lies outside this limited jurisdiction, and the burden of establishing the contrary rests upon the party asserting / / / / / 27 28 jurisdiction." Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.