Kramer

Kramer v. Avis

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20203:19-cv-00421California4,751 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID KENT GREENLEY, individually Case No.: 19-CV-00421-GPC-AHG and on behalf of all others similar 12 situated, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND Plaintiff,

REMANDING THE ACTION TO

14 v. STATE COURT. 15 AVIS BUDGET GROUP INC., a (ECF No. 56.) Delaware and New Jersey corporation Defendant. 18 Before the Court is Defendant Avis Budget Group, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff David Kent Greenley’s (“Plaintiff”) Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”). (ECF Nos. 38, 56.) Plaintiff alleges, in sum, that Defendant’s collection and storage of Plaintiff’s private information vis-à-vis the pairing of Plaintiff’s mobile phone to Defendant’s rental vehicle violates (1) the California Constitution, (2) California’s Rental Passenger Vehicle Transactions Law (“RPVTL”), and (3) California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”). (ECF No. 38.) Defendant moves to dismiss the TAC 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.