Moore

Moore v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 20203:20-cv-01608California740 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JULIE RAE M., Case No.: 20cv1608-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION TO PROCEED IN

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of

FORMA PAUPERIS

Social Security, 14 Defendant. [ECF No. 2] 16 On August 18, 2020, Plaintiff Julie Rae M. (“Plaintiff”) filed this social security appeal pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging the denial of her application for Social Security Disability Benefits and Supplemental Security Income disability benefits. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff simultaneously filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). For the reasons set forth herein, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP. All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, 26 must pay a filing fee of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.