Bouvy

Bouvy v. Analog Devices, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20203:19-cv-00881California1,474 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL BOUVY Case No.: 19-cv-881 DMS (BLM)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO RECONSIDER ANALOG DEVICES, INC., a Massachusetts company, as successor to

LINEAR TECHNOLOGY

CORPORATION; LINEAR TECHNOLOGY LLC, a Delaware 16 company; LINEAR TECHNOLOGY ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE; and

DOE DEFENDANTS 1–20,

18 Defendants. 19 20 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Reconsider the Court’s Order denying in part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. The matter is fully briefed and submitted. For the following reasons, the motion is denied. I. LEGAL STANDARD Generally, where a district court “has jurisdiction over the case, … it possesses the inherent procedural power to reconsider, rescind, or modify an interlocutory order for cause seen by it to be sufficient.” City of Los Angeles, Harbor Div. v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.