Standifird

Standifird v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 20203:20-cv-01630California1,875 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 Case No.: 20CV1630-BLM VICTORIA ELIZABETH STANDIFIRD,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

v. DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT

PREPAYING OF FEES OR COSTS

ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

[ECF NO. 7] Defendant.

14 The instant matter was initiated on August 21, 2020 when Plaintiff filed a complaint “to seek judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision and [to] request[] that this court reverse that decision, or in the alternative, to remand this matter for a new hearing.” ECF No. 1 at 2. That same day, Plaintiff filed an Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs. ECF No. at 3. On September 1, 2020, the Court issued an Order Denying Without Prejudice Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Of Fees or Costs and Dismissing Complaint with Leave to Amend. ECF No. 5. On September 3, 2020, Plaintiff filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.