Kouball

Kouball v. Seaworld Parks & Entertainment, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20203:20-cv-00870California4,556 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LISA KOUBALL, on behalf of herself, Case No.: 20-cv-870-CAB-BGS and all others similarly situated,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

Plaintiff, MOTION TO DISMISS v.

SEAWORLD PARKS &

ENTERTAINMENT, INC.,

[Doc. No. 12] 16 Defendant. 17 This matter is before the Court on a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint filed by Defendant SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc. (“SeaWorld”). [Doc. No. 12.] The Court held a telephonic hearing on September 9, 2020. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants SeaWorld’s motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Lisa Kouball filed this putative consumer class action complaint against Defendant SeaWorld on May 8, 2020. [Doc. No. 1.] The complaint asserts claims for: (1) violation of California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1750, et seq.; (2) violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200, et seq.; (3) violation of California’s False…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.