Rosales

Rosales v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20203:19-cv-02303California2,372 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOLORES ROSALES, Case No.: 19-CV-2303 JLS (LL)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION FOR SECURITY OF

COSTS

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; SHERIFF

WILLIAM D. GORE; DEPUTY

(ECF No. 8) TERENCE YORK, an individual; DEPUTY BRANDON DELIMA, an individual; DEPUTY EVAN 17 MCCORMICK, an individual, DEPUTY NICHOLAS ADAMS, an individual; DEPUTY ERIC COTTRELL, JR., an 19 individual, DEPUTY CARL FIELSTRA, an individual; DEPUTY BRIAN SCHAEFER, an individual; DEPUTY 21 CHRISTOPHER PEREZ, an individual; SERGEANT DWAIN WASHINGTON, an individual, DEPUTY RONALD 23 BUSHNELL, an individual; DEPUTY STEVEN FEALY, an individual; DEPUTY SCOTT ROSALL, an 25 individual; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. 28 Presently before the Court is Defendants County of San Diego and William D. Gore’s Motion for Security of Costs (“Mot.,” ECF No. 8), as well as Plaintiff Dolores 3 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.