Rezek

Rezek v. U.S. Bank National Association

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20203:20-cv-00578California3,102 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 CLAUDIA REZEK Case No.: 3:20-CV-00578 W (BLM)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. STRIKE PORTIONS OF

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED

U.S. BANK NATIONAL

COMPLAINT [DOC. 8]

ASSOCIATION, AND DOES 1-

17 Defendants.

19 Pending before the Court is Defendant U.S. Bank National Association’s motion to strike portions of Plaintiff Claudia Rezek’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). [Doc. 8.] Plaintiff opposes. [Doc. 10.] The Court decides the matters on the papers submitted and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES the motion. [Doc. 8.] Defendant’s Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. [Doc. 8-1.] Defendant’s original Motions to Dismiss [Doc. 3] and to Strike Portions of the Complaint [Doc. 4] are DENIED AS MOOT following the FAC’s filing. 28 I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Plaintiff’s FAC asserts various causes of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.