The Upper Deck Company v. Panini America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20203:20-cv-00185California249 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THE UPPER DECK COMPANY, a Case No.: 20cv185-GPC(KSC) Nevada corporation,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

Plaintiff, MOTION TO STRIKE FIRST v. AMENDED COMPLAINT AS MOOT

PANINI AMERICA, INC.,

[Dkt. No. 24.] Defendant.

17 Pursuant to the Court’s order granting in part and denying in part Defendant’s 18 motion to dismiss, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint on July 20, 2020. (Dkt. No. 19 23.) On August 3, 2020, Defendant file a motion to strike portions of the first amended 20 complaint. (Dkt. No. 24.) On August 24, 2020, Plaintiff filed a second amended 21 complaint. (Dkt. No. 28.) On September 8, 2020, Defendant filed an answer to the 22 second amended complaint. Because the second amended complaint supersedes the first 23 amended complaint and the latter treated as non-existent, see Ramirez v. Cnty. of San 24 Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. 2015), the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 /…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.