Spikes

Spikes v. Mann

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20203:19-cv-00633California4,117 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREL SPIKES, Case No.: 19-CV-633 JLS (RBB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

DEFAULT JUDGMENT

v.

TERRENCE WILLIAM MANN (ECF No. 11)

TRUSTEE OF THE TERRENCE

WILLIAM MANN TRUST AND

TRUSTEE OF THE MANN FAMILY TRUST 3-13-04; THE DANK HOUSE, a 17 business entity whose form is unknown; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants.

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Karel Spikes’ Application for Default Judgment Against Defendant Terrence William Mann (“Mot.,” ECF No. 11). The Court took the matter under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). See ECF No. 12. Having carefully reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion, Complaint, and supporting evidence and having weighed the relevant factors, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion (ECF No. 11). / / / / / / BACKGROUND I. Plaintiff’s Allegations Plaintiff has a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.