Goetz

Goetz v. SS Disability

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20203:19-cv-01603California5,670 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

□ 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 || TERRY H.G., Case No.: 3:19-cv-01603-CAB-RBM Plaintiff, REPORT AND 13 || RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE RE:

14 |] SS DISABILITY, PLAINTIFF’S MERITS BRIEF Defendant. 15 16 [Doc. 25] 18 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Terry H. G. (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of the Social Security Act (“the Act”). (Docs. 1, 6.) 22 || Plaintiff seeks judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Defendant” or ||“Commissioner”) final decision denying Plaintiff's application for disability and disability 24 || insurance benefits. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). There are two briefs before the Court. The first is Plaintiff's Merits Brief (“Merits 26 || Brief’ or “Motion”) which the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.