Chromy

Chromy v. C R Bard Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20203:20-cv-01678California1,283 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

United States District Court

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BALLAS DIVISION

JACQUELINE HENRY et al. §

CIVIL ACTION NO, 3:20-CV-1533-S

C.R. BARD INCORPORATED et al.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

‘This Order addresses Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion to Sever and Transfer Venue of Out- of-State Plaintiffs’ Cases [ECF No. 19]. Defendants filed a Response to the Motion, stating that they do not oppose severance and transfer of the cases identified in the Motion. See ECF No. 22. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the Motion.

I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs filed this action in the state district court. See Notice of Removal Ex. D-2. Defendants timely removed the case to this Court based on diversity of citizenship. See Notice of Removal. Plaintiffs filed the pending Motion on August 3, 2020, which is now ripe and pending before the Court.

II SEVERANCE

A court has broad discretion to sever issues under Rule 21, see Brunet v. United Gas Pipeline Co., F.3d 500, 505 (Sth Cir. 1994), and that discretion similarly allows for the severance and transfer of parties in the interest of justice, see Spencer, White &…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.