Ludlow

Ludlow v. Flowers Foods, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20203:18-cv-01190-JO-JLBCalifornia1,325 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL LUDLOW, an individual and on Case No.: 18-CV-1190 JLS (JLB) behalf of others similarly-situated; and 12 WILLIAM LANCASTER, individually ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S and on behalf of others similarly-situated, MOTION FOR TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER

Plaintiffs,

v. (ECF No. 175) FLOWERS FOODS, INC., et al., Defendants. 18 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff David Aguero’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 175). After the Court set a briefing schedule, ECF No. 176, Defendants filed a Response in Opposition to the Motion (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 178) and Plaintiff filed a Reply in Support of the Motion (“Reply,” ECF No. 180). After reviewing the Parties’ arguments and the law, the Court DENIES the Motion. Plaintiff David Aguero joined this action on May 13, 2019, when he “affirmatively consented to join the FLSA class in this action for Flowers’ violations of the Fair Labor 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.