Garrison

Garrison v. Ringgold

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20203:19-cv-00244California5,303 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TOMMY GARRISON, an individual; and Case No.: 19-cv-0244-GPC (DEB) CHRISTINE GARRISON, an individual,

REPORT AND

Plaintiffs, RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT v. IN PART AND DENY IN PART 14 PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR

REGINALD BUDDY RINGGOLD, III

TERMINATING SANCTIONS aka Rasool Abdul Rahim El, an

individual; ROSEGOLD [DKT. NO. 57] INVESTMENTS, LLP, a Delaware 17 partnership; and MASTER INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., a California corporation, 19 Defendants.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Terminating Sanctions, which the Honorable Gonzalo P. Curiel referred to the undersigned for Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Civil Local Rule 72.1(c). Dkt. Nos. 57, 59. On June 4, 2020, the Court ordered Defendants Reginald Buddy Ringgold III (“Ringgold”), Rosegold Investments, LLP (“Rosegold”), and Master Investment Group, Inc’s (“MIG”) to file their oppositions to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.